Speculative Encounters

Deleuze, Riemann, and quantum theory

This essay is a speculative, philosophical exploration of the encounter between Deleuze’s concept of multiplicity, the Riemannian manifold, and configuration space in quantum theory. Although these domains arise from distinct intellectual traditions — philosophy, geometry, and physics — they reveal a suggestive resonance in how each addresses the problem of structure, variation, and relationality. At the center of this resonance is a shared displacement of fixed identities in favor of continuous fields, dynamic configurations, and locally defined relations.

In his texts, Deleuze constantly seeks and develops concepts adequate to a reality composed not of stable substances but of differential processes. In this effort, his turn to the mathematical figure of Riemannian manifold is arguably one of the most successful.

In its original domain, the Riemannian manifold is not merely a geometric abstraction but a radical reconfiguration of space. It offers a continuous topological structure where distances, curvatures, and transformations are defined locally, without recourse to any absolute or transcendent background. This locality is a condition of immanence: the manifold defines geometry through the differential relations that unfold in the neighborhood of each point. The local structure of space is described by how the metric and curvature vary infinitesimally across the manifold. What emerges from here is a model of space that is both topological and expressive, a diagram of internal variation rather than an external container.

Deleuze seizes upon this mathematical framework as a structure that can be transposed into philosophy. He transforms the manifold from a model of mathematical space into an ontological figure of multiplicity, a field of “pure difference,” defined not by what it contains but by the relations it composes. In doing so, he does not simply borrow from topology but reconfigures it to articulate a vision of being as inherently differential, immanent, and open to variations.

Deleuze, however, does not merely adopt the concept; he transforms it into a philosophical instrument integral to his project. What in Riemann was a model for spatial variation becomes, in Deleuze, a metaphysical principle of becoming. Multiplicity is no longer merely a descriptive geometry; it becomes the very structure of reality itself, a field of immanent variation in which difference precedes identity, and transformation is ontologically prior to any fixed being. If the manifold permits the flexible measurement of spatial change, multiplicity grounds the genesis of phenomena, events, and relations through the continuous and discontinuous play of virtual differences.

The ontological openness of Deleuze’s concept of multiplicity invites speculative encounters across disciplinary boundaries. Configuration space in quantum theory offers one such encounter, not so much as an analogy to be asserted but more as a field of resonance to be explored. Just as Riemann introduced the manifold as a locally variable, intrinsically defined space no longer dependent on external coordinates, quantum theory extends this vision by situating the state of the entire universe within an abstract, high-dimensional configuration space. Whether in approaches such as the Wheeler-DeWitt equation or the Many Worlds interpretation, the universal wave function is defined over such a space. It is not composed of discrete objects in external relation but of internally encoded variables and relational structures. Each point in this space represents a complete configuration of the system, not a mere position but an entire structural state.

This resonance becomes more tangible when we consider the structural affinities between the Riemannian manifold and configuration space. Both are defined locally and immanently: the manifold encodes its geometry through differential relations in the neighborhood of each point, while configuration space determines quantum states through internally specified variables, without reliance on any external background. Neither functions as a passive container; each serves as an active field in which relations unfold and structure emerges. Just as the manifold expresses curvature and topology through intrinsic variation, configuration space encodes the state of a quantum system as a distribution over possible configurations, each point representing a complete systemic arrangement. Both spaces are continuous, high-dimensional, and abstract, departing from the familiar intuitions of three-dimensional perception. Both enact a shift away from substance and toward relation, from fixed entities to fields of differential structure.

In quantum cosmology, this space is often referred to as superspace, the space of all possible three-dimensional spatial geometries. The wave function defined in this space does not simply track change over time but expresses a landscape of possibilities, structured by internal variation and relational parameters. This image opens a pathway for thinking alongside Deleuze’s conception of multiplicity as a field of differential relations, a topology of potential that precedes and conditions actualization.

In Deleuze’s ontology, the virtual is the condition of the actual, a field of differential relations that precedes and informs every individuated form. Quantum theory does not name such a field as virtual, but some of its structures, such as configuration space or the universal wave function, may be understood as playing a similar functional role. They represent a space of relational variation from which observable states emerge. In this light, the manifold does not serve merely as a background or structural model but becomes a medium of genesis, a space in which each point is defined by its relations and intensities. Whether or not these frameworks ultimately align, their proximity is philosophically curious enough to invite further thought.

Both the configuration spaces of modern physics and Deleuze’s concept of multiplicity can be traced, in different ways, to Riemann’s manifold. Historically, the notion of configuration space predates Riemann, appearing in classical mechanics as the set of all possible positions a system may occupy. But it was Riemann’s redefinition of space as a locally variable manifold, no longer dependent on a fixed background, that opened the path for a generalized treatment of configuration spaces as differentiable structures. In the wake of Riemann, physical theories began to treat spaces of possible states, whether of particles, fields, or geometries, not as abstract collections of points but as manifolds with intrinsic curvature, topology, and relational structure. Superspace, the configuration space of all spatial geometries in quantum cosmology, is one such example.

Deleuze, for his part, explicitly draws on Riemann in formulating multiplicity as a metaphysical topology of difference. Where the physicist sees a space of potential states, Deleuze sees a field of virtual variation. While their aims diverge, the conceptual architecture they inherit and transform shares a common origin in Riemann’s profound rethinking of what it means for something to be structured as a space. Both configuration space and multiplicity replace fixed coordinates with internally defined relations and treat the point not as a basic unit but as an expression of differential structure.

Read the full essay here - Speculative Encounters: Deleuze, Riemann, and Quantum Theory